Will Re-Election Embolden Governor Christie’s Position on Choice?
Friday, August 2, 2013 • 9:27am
Last month, I attended a rally for the Democratic gubernatorial candidate State Senator Barbara Buono—well-attended for a Saturday event in July with more than 100 residents—at which she called her opponent, Governor Chris Christie, “rabidly anti-choice.” Even I noted her strong words. On Sunday I read Tom Moran’s column in the Star Ledger in which he says that if Christie is able to take control of the Senate in November, “he (Christie) is off to the races on taxes, abortion and anything else that appeals to Iowa Republicans.”
As a pro-choice woman who strongly believes that reproductive decisions must be made by women and their families, I am increasingly alarmed at events in the south and southwest and fear that this anti-woman sentiment might move north. I am appalled that legislators are changing the rules for women—clearly signaling that women are not smart enough, or can’t be trusted enough, to make their own choices. When to become a parent should be decided by each woman, not by men in government office buildings.
Case in point, Texas Governor Rick Perry’s signing of a package of laws that will drastically reduce access to abortion across his state. Most of the bills are meant to make it hard for clinics to comply with the law because of requirements, such as admitting privileges for doctors at local hospitals and the width of the hallways. One provision requires doctors to administer RU-486, rather than allow a woman to take the pills at home by herself. All of these restrictions may lead to the closure of all but five abortion clinics in the state of Texas, the second largest state in the Union, with a population of 26.1 million residents.
If Governor Christie wins re-election I think we will have cause for alarm right here in New Jersey. He vetoed two bills relating to Medicaid in the last legislative session. The first one was a bill expanding Medicaid coverage for family planning services for single women. The second was a bill that would make permanent the Medicaid expansion that he did approve. One can only assume that the Governor had no choice but to agree to expand Medicaid because the expansion brought with it $227 million in matching funds from the federal government. This flexibility allows Christie to say he expanded Medicaid, which helps him win re-election in New Jersey, while giving him the ability to back-pedal next year if the national agenda demands it.
In addition, the Governor also vetoed much needed funding for a public awareness campaign to explain the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance “marketplace,” for which sign-up begins on October 1, 2013.
But the most troubling omission from the state budget—for the fourth year in a row—is the $7.4 million for family planning clinics that Governor Christie cut out of the budget in 2009. This funding was used to provide basic reproductive health care services across the state, including cancer-screenings, birth control, prevention and treatment of STIs, breast health services, Pap tests, and other health screenings. This funding was not used for abortion services. In 2009, the last year the funding was available, 136,000 patients were served.
According to the Family Planning Association of New Jersey’s latest report these are some of the impacts of the cut of $7.4 million which resulted in the closing of six clinics:
· In 2012, New Jersey’s family planning providers saw at least 33,000 fewer patients compared to 2009 – a 24% drop in patients served.
· The number of clinical breast exams performed at these providers dropped from 70,506 in 2009 to 48,441 in 2012 – a 31% drop over three years.
· From 2009-2012, the number of gonorrhea tests declined by 24%, Chlamydia by 28%, syphilis by 29%, and HIV by 18%.
· More than 6 in 10 patients who receive care at a family planning center consider it their primary source of health care, therefore, women depending on these clinics for basic health care may be without any care today.
In Union County, the towns affected by these cuts serve some of our poorest residents. Women who have less resources have fewer choices about where they go for services, how far they can travel, how much time they can take off from work, and how much they can spend on child care to go to the clinic. For example, the Elizabeth health center served over 900 fewer patients in 2010 than they did in 2009, and the Plainfield health center served 300 fewer patients, due to staff reductions and restructuring suffered because of the $7.4 million cut.
In Essex County, Newark was the biggest loser due to cuts in both federal Title X funding and the $7.4 million that Christie axed. Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan New Jersey, which operates centers in the Ironbound and on Washington Street next to the Rutgers Campus, lost a total of $1.2 million in state funding. Before the Governor’s cut, the centers were only able to see about 30% of the residents needing services due to capacity issues. This percentage surely grew.
The Governor says that he is anti-choice, but right now he governs in a “blue” state and has to check his conservative agenda—not so once he is re-elected and on his way to the national stage. It behooves all women in New Jersey to educate themselves about Senator Barbara Buono. She’s pro-choice and proud of it.
Ann Ormsby is writer who lives in Westfield, NJ. Her articles have appeared in The Newark Star Ledger, The Huffington Post, njspotlight.com, nj.com, patch.com and The Westfield Leader, among other publications.
The Guest Column is our readers' opportunity to write about a given issue or topic in an in-depth and educational manner.
The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of TAPinto.net or anyone who works for TAPinto.net. TAPinto.net is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer.